State v. Fain
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
774 P.2d 252 (1989)
116 Idaho 82
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Charles I. FAIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15414.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
April 4, 1989.
Rehearing Denied May 30, 1989.
Van G. Bishop, Nampa, for appellant.
Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., argued, and Lynn E. Thomas, Sol. Gen., Boise, for respondent.
ON DENIAL OF PETITIONS FOR REHEARING
HUNTLEY, Justice.
This appeal has been protracted and no doubt agonizing to those directly involved. We have heard oral argument on several occasions and have been presented with more than one troubling issue requiring resolution. The pertinent facts are…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Shepard; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Huntley; Concurrence · Shepard; Concurrence · Bakes; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Huntley; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Johnson; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Bistline.
2Cases cited115 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.