Legal Opinion
People v. Castille
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 24, 2005No. A089623PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, Acting P. J.
Three defendants were tried together for murder with special circumstances and attendant enhancements. They had been questioned during a joint interview, a tape recording of which was admitted at trial. In our original opinion, we held that the statements were properly admitted against each defendant. (People v. Castille (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 469 [133 Cal.Rptr.2d 489]) (Castille I). The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36 [158 L.Ed.2d 177, 124 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Engle v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- In re Shields CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Bullock CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Rasberry CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.