Legal Opinion

Mecox Realty Corp. v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In action to recover a real estate brokerage commission, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.), entered October 25, 1991, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $48,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled "that in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, a real estate broker will be deemed to have earned his commission when he produces a buyer who is ready, willing and able to purchase at the terms set by the seller” (Lane-Real Estate Dept.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lane — Real Estate Department Store, Inc. v. Lawlet Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Hecht v. MellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Norma Reynolds Realty, Inc. v. WilczewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Cornelia & Broad Streets, Inc. v. ChaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Re/Max Homes & Estates, Inc. v. LeistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Kling Real Estate, Ltd. v. DePalmaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Brenhouse v. Shah Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Praedia Realty Corp. v. DurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Coldwell Banker Village Green Realty v. PillsworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API