Mecox Realty Corp. v. Rose
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In action to recover a real estate brokerage commission, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.), entered October 25, 1991, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $48,000.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
It is well settled "that in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, a real estate broker will be deemed to have earned his commission when he produces a buyer who is ready, willing and able to purchase at the terms set by the seller” (Lane-Real Estate Dept.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lane — Real Estate Department Store, Inc. v. Lawlet Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Hecht v. MellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Norma Reynolds Realty, Inc. v. WilczewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Cornelia & Broad Streets, Inc. v. ChaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by9 opinions
- Re/Max Homes & Estates, Inc. v. LeistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Kling Real Estate, Ltd. v. DePalmaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Brenhouse v. Shah Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Praedia Realty Corp. v. DurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Coldwell Banker Village Green Realty v. PillsworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.