Legal Opinion

Ayesha v. Hussain

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 1, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00210Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON NOOR AYESHA NH, : Case No. 3:22-cv-210 : Plaintiff, : : District Judge Thomas M. Rose vs. : Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. : AHMED HUSSAIN, et al., : : Defendants. : : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS1 This matter is before the Court sua sponte for an initial review of pro se Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). For the reasons that follow, it is RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISS this action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff filed her Complaint in June 2022 (Doc.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API