Legal Opinion
People v. Robles
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 6, 1995PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and the case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, in accordance with CPL 470.25 (2) (d) and CPL 470.40 (2) (b).
Defendant was charged with criminal sale and possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. He and his lawyer were "personally present” (CPL 260.20) at the Sandoval hearing, though no interpreter was present. Defense counsel, however, never requested an interpreter and made no objection to the Sandoval hearing going forward without one. Defendant was later convicted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. RoblesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by27 opinions
- Qabail Hizbullahankhamon v. Hans Walker, the Superintendent of Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- People v. Garcia-CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. RestoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. LambAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.