Legal Opinion

Prankard v. Josephthal

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to vacate notice for examination of witnesses.

1Opinion of the CourtBorst, J.

The defendant moves to vacate a notice under which plaintiff has taken the depositions of witnesses for use on *861the trial of this action, mainly upon the ground that the notice does not state the issues upon which the persons named in it are to be examined. The notice was given and the depositions taken under section 290 of the Civil Practice Act. The notice stated that “ The issues upon which said persons are to be examined are: All the issues raised by the plaintiff’s complaint and the answers of the defendants * * * being substantially the allegations of paragraph 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th * * *…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buehler v. BushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCullough v. AuditoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Rubin v. SheldonNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API