Legal Opinion

City of Dixon v. Allemand

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 6, 1907No. Gen. No. 4,810Published

Action on the case. Appeal 2rom the Circuit Court of Lee County; the Hon. Oscar E. Heard, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

The city argues that Kelly, the contractor who laid the new sidewalk, is the one. who is responsible to plaintiffs, but the proof is that the cutting down of the grade of the ground where the new sidewalk was to be and the cutting into plaintiff’s lot was not done by him but by the superintendent of streets under the direction of and upon the lines fixed by the city engineer. The contract between Kelly and the city, and the ordinance under which that contract was entered into, did not provide for work on this particular street, at least hy its true or usual name, and the city therefore argues…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Village of Jefferson v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Vail v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. City of Chicago v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. City of Chicago v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API