Legal Opinion

Herring Networks, INC v. Maddow

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 22, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01713Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 HERRING NETWORKS, INC., Case No. 19-cv-1713-BAS-AHG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING 13 DEFENDANTS’ SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 v. [ECF No. 18] 15 RACHEL MADDOW, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff Herring Networks, Inc. filed a complaint for defamation against 20 Rachel Maddow; Comcast Corporation; NBCUniversal Media, LLC; and MSNBC 21 Cable LLC. (ECF No. 1.) The claim stems from a statement Rachel Maddow made 22 on The Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC. Soon after Plaintiff filed suit, Defendants 23 filed a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API