Legal Opinion

Latynski-Rossiter v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 5, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-2286PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Tadeusz Latynski-Rossiter is a nineteen-year-old student who suffers from learning disabilities. To address his needs, his parents placed him in a private school in Maryland. They seek reimbursement for his tuition under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. During administrative proceedings below, the hearing officer concluded that the parents lacked standing because their child is an adult. The parents brought this suit to challenge the hearing officer’s decision. For the reasons…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Doe v. Westport Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API