Legal Opinion
Grant v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 17, 1995No. 0:89-cv-00280PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
Application by Westinghouse Electric Corporation (“Westinghouse”) for judgment as a matter of law, pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or alternatively, for a new trial, is denied. Moreover, the application of Abraham & Straus Corporation (“A & S”), the third-party defendant, for the same relief, is denied. However, A & S’s application for a reduction in the amount awarded by the jury for future medical expenses is granted.
INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs Grant and Hart, while in the employ of A & S, sustained injuries from an explosion of an…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Haskell v. Kaman Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Barry v. ManglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. PatakiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- Blissett v. EisensmidtDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Del Cid v. Beloit Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- CEPA Consulting Ltd. v. New York National Bank, Inc. (In Re Wedtech Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Golub v. Metropolitan Property & Cas. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.