Apex Mining v. Blankenship
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
In addition to questions of evidence, this appeal concerns two matters of first impression: 1.) whether, upon proof of the requisite facts, an injured worker is entitled to receive the 15% penalty authorized by KRS 342.165 in addition to income benefits for total disability, and 2.) whether the violation of KRS 338.031 which occurred in this case constitutes a safety violation for the purposes of KRS 342.165.
Claimant was permanently disabled as a result of an accident which occurred while he was operating a road grader, and an award of benefits for total disability was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cabe v. SkeensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Scudamore v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
- Gibbs Automatic Moulding Co. v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
3Cited by21 opinions
- Brusman v. Newport Steel Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000
- Realty Improvement Co., Inc. v. RaleyKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- AIG/AIU Insurance Co. v. South Akers Mining Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Cabinet for Workforce Development v. CumminsKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.