Legal Opinion

Apex Mining v. Blankenship

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1996No. 95-SC-671-WCPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

In addition to questions of evidence, this appeal concerns two matters of first impression: 1.) whether, upon proof of the requisite facts, an injured worker is entitled to receive the 15% penalty authorized by KRS 342.165 in addition to income benefits for total disability, and 2.) whether the violation of KRS 338.031 which occurred in this case constitutes a safety violation for the purposes of KRS 342.165.

Claimant was permanently disabled as a result of an accident which occurred while he was operating a road grader, and an award of benefits for total disability was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cabe v. SkeensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  2. Scudamore v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
  3. Gibbs Automatic Moulding Co. v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brusman v. Newport Steel Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000
  3. Realty Improvement Co., Inc. v. RaleyKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  4. AIG/AIU Insurance Co. v. South Akers Mining Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Cabinet for Workforce Development v. CumminsKentucky Supreme Court · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API