Legal Opinion
People v. Lee
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided May 31, 2018No. A146214PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.
*53At issue in this case is the availability of restitution for noneconomic losses to certain victims of child sex abuse, under a *718prior version of Penal Code section 1202.4, subdivision (f)(3)(F) that was effective until December 31, 2017.1
Although an award of restitution to crime victims ordinarily must be limited to economic losses, former section 1202.4, subdivision (f)(3)(F) required an award of restitution for noneconomic losses "for felony violations of Section 288." (Stats. 2012, ch. 873, § 1.) Section 288 criminalizes lewd and lascivious conduct toward children under the age of 14 and,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. BlackburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scott v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Montiel, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Scott v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019