Southeastern Roofing Distributors M. C. N. C., Inc. v. Ridgill Roofing & Siding Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Ridgill Roofing and Siding Company, R. A. Ridgill, Jr., and Lyndall P. Ridgill appeal the actions of the trial judge in striking their defense of usury and in directing the verdict in this accounting matter against them. We affirm.
The appellants in their answer admit that an amount is owed on their open account with respondent Southeastern *592Roofing Distributors M. C. N. C., Inc. but contend that the contracted for service charge of 1)4 per cent per month (18% per annum) on all past due account balances is usurious and therefore not recoverable by respondent. The respondent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dennis v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
- Fox v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Standard Oil Company (Indiana) v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Brown v. CrandallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Davenport v. Unicapital Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
3Cited by1 opinion
- Midland Guardian Co. v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984