Legal Opinion

United States v. Bergen

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 27, 1956No. 6642PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused was convicted of a violation of a general order prohibiting the use of a central nervous system stimulant, such as ephedrine and its related compounds. His conviction and sentence which includes a dishonorable discharge was affirmed by intermediate authorities. The accused appeals to this Court. Two errors are assigned for our consideration. The first concerns the admissibility of certain answers by a witness testifying by written deposition. The second relates to the law officer’s instructions on ignorance of fact as a defense.

_…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Halsey v. . SinsebaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. United States v. GreenwoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  5. People v. GezzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. BryantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  2. United States v. HollowayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  3. United States v. WynnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. ChunnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  5. United States v. WebbUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API