Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Sholl

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 12, 1924No. Gen. No. 7,227Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jett

This is a suit brought by Peter Hurst, appellee, against James M. Sholl, Samuel Y. Sholl and Mary L. Sholl, individually and as executrix of the last will and testament of Henry S. Sholl, deceased, to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by reason of a, subsidence caused by the mining of coal under appellee’s house. After this proceeding was instituted Samuel Y. Sholl departed this life, his death was suggested upon the record and his administratrix, Elizabeth Lackey, substituted as a defendant.

A trial before the court and jury resulted in a verdict for $5,000 in favor of appellee…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hartshorn v. . ChaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Fitz Simons & Connell Co. v. Braun & FittsIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. McNulta v. LockridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. JerkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Anderson v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API