Legal Opinion
Manseau v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 18, 1943No. 3555PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEDERLE, District Judge.
Counsel for both parties appeared at the pretrial hearing at which time it was shown that there was no dispute as to the facts in this case and a pretrial order was entered in accordance with Rule 16 of the Rules of’ Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, setting forth all of the agreed facts in detail.
The facts necessary for a consideration of the legal questions involved may be summarized as follows: Plaintiff was wrongfully discharged by the Ford Motor Company for union activities. An order of the National Labor Relations Board requiring plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National Labor Relations Board v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Northwestern Yeast Co. v. BroutinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Metro Louisville/Jefferson County Government v. AbmaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
- Fletcher v. Grinnell Bros.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1946
- Griggs v. SandsTennessee Supreme Court · 1975