Legal Opinion

Mogelefsky v. Schoem

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 7, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

90 N.J. Super. 49 (1966)

216 A.2d 236

HAROLD MOGELEFSKY AND MARTIN A. BERMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

IRA SCHOEM, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF CLIFTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

MARTIN A. BERMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

IRA SCHOEM, MAYOR, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 8, 1965.

Decided January 7, 1966.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

Mr. Clive S. Cummis argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Schiff, Cummis & Kent, attorneys; Mr. Michael B. Tischman and Mr. Steven S. Radin, on the brief).

Mr. Sam Monchak argued the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moyant v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Coculo v. City of TrentonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  3. State v. StocklNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grillo v. Bd. of Realtors of Plainfield AreaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  2. Mogolefsky v. SchoemSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  3. Trombetta v. Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  4. Bonito v. BLOOMFIELD TP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Toms River Pub. Co. v. Borough of ManasquanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API