Legal Opinion

Town of Tilton v. State

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 27, 1993No. 92-290PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.

The plaintiffs, the Towns of Tilton and Northfield, appeal an order of the Superior Court (Hollman, J.) granting summary judgment for the State on the ground that the lack of a contract cosigned by the State precluded, as a matter of law, the plaintiffs’ claims of indemnification pursuant to RSA 149-G:2 (Supp. 1972) (current version at RSA 485-A:46 (1992)). We affirm.

*464This case presents the third appeal to this court arising from the same set of facts. See Morgenroth & Assoc’s, Inc. v. Town of Tilton, 121 N.H. 511, 431 A.2d 770 (1981) (Morgenroth I); Morgenroth & Assoc’s v. State, 126 N.H.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morgenroth & Associates, Inc. v. Town of TiltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. In re Trailer & Plumbing SuppliesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  3. Theresa S. v. Superintendent of Youth Development CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  4. Morgenroth & Associates, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Horse Pond Fish & Game Club, Inc. v. CormierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anglin v. KleemanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Penrich, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. Laro v. Leisure Acres Mobile Home Park AssociatesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. Vaillancourt v. Granite Group (In Re Vaillancourt)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API