Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Arthur Treachers
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided May 6, 1986No. Record No. 0988-85PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KEENAN, J.
This case presents the issue whether the Industrial Commission erred in refusing to combine an employee’s wages in concurrent dissimilar employment for the purpose of calculating his “average weekly wage” under Code § 65.1-6. We conclude that the Commission did not err and affirm.
Robert L. Hudson was injured while working part-time as a food fryer for Arthur Treachers. As a result, he was unable to perform this part-time job as well as his full-time job as a concrete finisher. The parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement on November 10, 1983, which fixed compensation at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peyton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Eason v. EasonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- American Uniform & Rental Service v. TrainerSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Baskerville v. Saunders Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
- J & D Masonry, Inc. v. KornegaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- First Virginia Banks, Inc. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
- Creedle Sales Co., Inc. v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- A. H. Jacoby Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
- Uninsured Employer's Fund v. ThrushSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- King Land Corp. v. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.