Legal Opinion

Lenford Never Misses a Shot v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 7, 2005No. 05-1233PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Per curiam

Lenford Never Misses A Shot appeals the district court’s 1 judgment denying his initial motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to set aside his sentence. Never Misses A Shot argues that his 220-month sentence for sexual abuse and escape convictions was imposed in violation of United States v. Booker, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Because we conclude that Never Misses A Shot may not collaterally attack his sentence based on Booker, we affirm.

Never Misses A Shot pleaded guilty to sexual abuse, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 2242(2), and escape, see 18 U.S.C. § 751(a). At his May 2004…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. United States v. DunphyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  2. Jimmy Ray Valentine (04-2116) Kenneth Jerome Valentine (05-1877) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Anjulo-Lopez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Debra Lynn MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Juan Gerardo Hernandez, Also Known as ChapinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API