Legal Opinion
Paper Systems Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corp.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 19, 1997No. Civil Action 96-C-0959PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS
REYNOLDS, District Judge.
Paper Systems Incorporated (“Paper Systems”) is suing the defendants for violations of section one of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Allegedly, the defendants conspired to fix the price of thermal fax paper. Two of the defendants Nippon Paper Industries, Co., Ltd. (“Nippon”), and New Oji Paper Company Ltd., (“Oji”), have moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction; both are alien corporations. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). In the alternative, Oji asks the court to transfer the case to the Western…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Go-Video, Inc. v. Akai Electric Company, Ltd., and Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Heritage House Restaurants, Inc., Heritage House Smorgasbord of Oklahoma City, and Heritage House of Indianapolis v. Continental Funding Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re: Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation Basf Ag and Basf Coatings AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Action Embroidery Corp. v. Atlantic Embroidery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Angus Chemical Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- In Re Triton Ltd. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.