Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Barrera v. West

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided February 25, 2000No. 90-1496Published

1ConcurrenceKramer, Judge

I have reviewed Judge Steinberg’s articulate dissent, but nevertheless must take issue with it on the following grounds. First, I disagree that there is case precedent that holds that this Court has jurisdiction to consider an award under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) for work done in the Federal Circuit during a period when this Court was divested of any jurisdiction over the underlying matter. Although an inference could be drawn to that effect from the cited precedent, none of the cited cases directly addresses the jurisdictional question.

Second, even assuming that the Court has'…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Stillwell v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API