Legal Opinion

People v. Betts

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 31, 1979No. 78-1042PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SIMON

delivered the opinion of the court:

In this prosecution, which was instituted by grand jury indictment, the State found it necessary to amend the indictment several times to properly state the offense which it felt its proof would show. The issue is whether these amendments were permissible under the statute which allows amendments to correct technical and formal defects such as miswriting, misspelling, grammatical errors or the failure to negative any proviso contained in the statute defining the offense. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 111 — 5.) Our conclusion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. The People v. ParrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  3. People v. TrouttAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Patrick v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. People v. HouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Betts v. Department of Registration & EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. People v. RodriguezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. People v. DossAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API