Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Dorsaneo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a bifurcated trial in this personal injury action. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion and thus a fortiori failed to establish the need to depart from the general rule that “issues of liability and damages in a negligence action are distinct and severable issues which should be tried and determined separately” (Martinez v Town of Babylon, 191 AD2d 483, 484; see, Loncz v Blagrove, 254 AD2d 735, 736; Cutsogeorge v Hertz Corp., 239 AD2d 540;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Loncz v. BlagroveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Cutsogeorge v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mazur v. MazurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Piccione v. Tri-main Development, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Wesselenyi v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API