Legal Opinion

State v. Preston

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 2001No. Case No. CA2000-06-125PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Valen, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Patricia Preston, appeals her conviction in Hamilton Municipal Court for street racing. This opinion is based upon the record and the brief of appellant. The city of Hamilton has again failed to file a brief to present its legal arguments. App.R. 18(C) provides, inter alia, that when an appellee fails to file a brief, a reviewing court, in determining the appeal, may accept appellant’s statement of the facts and issues as correct and reverse the judgment if appellant’s brief reasonably appears to sustain such action. This court has considered the legal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. EskridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. GoodmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Wood, 06ap-1032 (6-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API