Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bennett v. Bird

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1933Published

1Dissent

Scudder, J. (dissenting).

Plaintiff sued to recover upon a promissory note made by Amory Browne & Company, 1928 Firm *546of Boston, Massachusetts, of which firm defendants had been partners. The firm has been dissolved. Defendant, respondent, Meffert resides in this State and has been duly served with the summons and complaint. Defendant, appellant, Amory resides in Massachusetts and was not served with the summons and complaint, and did not appear in the action by attorney or otherwise.

The pleadings indicate that Meffert’s defense relates not only to plaintiff’s alleged claim, but also…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kay v. . WhittakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Joy v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API