Legal Opinion

McCullough v. McCullough

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1910No. 2056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Son. J. A. Sowell, Judge. Action by Jolm McCullough against Mary McCullough. From an order vacating the order substituting as defendant the administrator of defendant, and denying a motion to modify the judgment rendered in the action, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, C. J.

In 1901, in an action wherein the appellant was plaintiff and Mary A. McCullough, defendant, a judgment of divorce was rendered on her counterclaim, in favor of the defendant, and certain real estate awarded to her. In 1902, and in that action, the appellant, by motion and on notice, asked that the decree in respect to the property awarded to defendant be modified. Upon a hearing had the motion was denied. Again, in 1905, the appellant made a similar motion, which *149on a bearing was also denied. In December, 1908, tbe defendant died. In January, 1909, tbe appellant moved tbe court to substitute…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Busby v. Electric Utilities Employees UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. Cornelius v. Mohave Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Swauger v. LawlerUtah Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API