Legal Opinion
Cerilli v. Kezis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 23, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dillon, J.), dated September 25, 2002, as granted the defendants’ renewed motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.
The complaint asserts that the plaintiff Albert A. Cerilli, Jr., was subjected to a medical procedure “without his consent.” The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spinosa v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Dougherty v. City of RyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lefkowitz v. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & HandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cerilli v. KezisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Thaw v. North Shore University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Salandy v. BrykAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Marquardt v. MarquardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Napolitano v. GustavsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.