Am. Rivers v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Many portions of Alabama's and Georgia's Coosa River ecosystem are in fragile condition after, among other things, decades *37 of power plant operations and development. In 2013, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission granted the Alabama Power Company a 30-year license to continue power generation on a portion of the Coosa River. A review of the licensed project's impact on the environment and endangered species documented that the project would cause a 100% take of multiple endangered mussels, a large loss of indigenous fish, and perilously low dissolved oxygen levels for substantial periods…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Florida Audubon Society v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and Margaret Richardson, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Center for Bio Diversity v. EPACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Narragansett Indian Tribal Historic Preservation Office v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Appalachian Voices v. US Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Nat'l Parks Conservation Ass'n v. SemoniteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Shafer & Freeman Lakes Environmental Conservation Corporation v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.