Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Librizzi
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtDel Sole, P.J.
¶ 1 Appellant Curtis Librizzi filed this appeal pro se from the judgment of sentence imposed after he pled guilty to three counts of possession with intent to deliver cocaine. 1 For the reasons set forth below, we remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings.
¶ 2 This case presents a procedural problem which is becoming all too common throughout Pennsylvania. On April 7, 2000, Attorney David H. Acker entered his appearance. Attorney Acker represented Appellant through pretrial motions, plea negotiations, entry of a guilty plea and sentencing. He did not file either…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. WileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Adee, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Black, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.