Legal Opinion

ASSENTI v. SAUL

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01379Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH P. ASSENTI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 20-1379 ) ANDREW SAUL, ) ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of September 2021, the Court, having considered the parties’ motions for summary judgment, will order judgment in the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) favor, except that the Court will deny the Commissioner’s request to have costs taxed against Plaintiff.1 The Court is satisfied that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. Thomas Williams v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. Dolores WALLACE, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API