Legal Opinion
Brettel v. Omron Scientific Techs., Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 27, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 14–13936–JGDPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judith Gail Dein, United States Magistrate Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Kristen Brettell, was injured while working on a laminating machine at the facility of her employer, Madico, Inc. ("Madico"). She brought this action against the defendants, Omron Scientific Technologies, Inc. and Omron STI Machine Services, Inc. (collectively "Omron"), alleging that Omron had been negligent in its inspection, testing and/or servicing of the laminating machine. Omron brought a Third-Party Complaint against Madico for contractual indemnification and breach of contract. This matter is presently before *463…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Theodore L. Leblanc v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Vineberg v. BissonnetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re: John Good as owner of the F/V Alosa, For Exoneration From Or Limitation Of LiabilityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Thomas Ryan, et al. v. The Newark Group, Inc., et al.; Thomas Ryan, et al. v. EIDP, Inc., et al.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
- Thomas Ryan, et al. v. The Newark Group, Inc., et. al.; Thomas Ryan, et al. v. EIDP, Inc, et alDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025