Newton Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Shaw
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.
The issue is whether there was any substantial evidence to support the jury’s $500 verdict in favor of appellee, Ernest Keith Shaw, a minor, by his next friend, in this suit upon the implied warranty of a bottler of a beverage that the beverage bottled and distributed by it is wholesome and safe for human consumption. *893After careful consideration of the record, we have concluded that there is no substantial, believable evidence to support a finding that (1) the extraneous matter was in the bottle when it left the factory and was offered to the public, and when some of it was drunk by appellee,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. LamensdorfMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Inc. v. SavageMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
- Davis v. McDonaldMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crocker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1977
- Joe McGinty v. Grand Casinos of Mississippi, Inc.- BiloxiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
- Joe McGinty v. Grand Casinos of Mississippi, Inc.- BiloxiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018