Bricken v. Cross
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Carroll Circuit Court. — Hon. William W. Ruciiee, Judge. (1) The description of the land and the judgment should correspond with the petition, or at least it shpuld appear that the premises recovered are within the boundaries of the description contained in the petition.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Carroll Circuit Court. — Hon. William W. Ruciiee, Judge. (1) The description of the land and the judgment should correspond with the petition, or at least it shpuld appear that the premises recovered are within the boundaries of the description contained in the petition. And the land should be described in such terms that the officer charged with the execution of a writ of possession describing it in the same terms will know from the writ what land it is his duty to put the plaintiff in possession of.. Livingston Go. v. Morris, 71 Mo. 603. The latter part of the description in the…
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
This is ejectment for' the following described tract of land in Carroll county, Missouri, to wit: Four and one half acres of land commencing at a point fifteen and fifty hundredths chains directly south of a point twelve and fifty hundredths chains directly west of the northeast corner of section number 17,fin township number 52, of.range number 22; thence running directly south fifty' links; thence running west twelve and fifty hundredths chains; thence running north six and seventy hundredths chains; thence running east twelve and fifty-one hundredths chains; north seventy degrees west to…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Hecker v. BleishSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Curd v. ReabanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Hill v. BarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Porter v. CountsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Bricken v. CrossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901