Legal Opinion

Ramon Portillo and Dolores Portillo v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1993No. 92-4526PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIK, District Judge:

Ramon and Dolores Portillo appeal an order of the Tax Court denying them litigation costs. A previous panel of this Court reversed the Tax Court’s decision in part, affirmed in part, and remanded for recalculation. Portillo v. C.I.R., 932 F.2d 1128 (5th Cir.1991). We find that the Tax Court abused its discretion in denying costs. We reverse, remand to the Tax Court for a determination of reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs, and deny sanctions.

The petitioners seek to have their litigation costs reimbursed as provided in 26 U.S.C. 7430. Recovery of litigation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Ramon Portillo and Dolores Portillo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Sokol v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rebecca Jo Reser v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Nalle v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Spurlock v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
  4. Marre' v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. Tanner v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API