Legal Opinion

Cox v. Rash

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Appellant claims title to real estate, of which Thomas J. Hicks died seized, upon the ground that she is the illegitimate child of the deceased.

It is incumbent upon one who seeks to establish title to real estate to show such facts as constitute title; the recovery must be upon the strength of the claimant’s own title, not upon the weakness of his adversary’s. It was necessary, therefore, for the appellant to prove title in herself, for no matter how weak that of her adversary, unless her own was good, no recovery could be had.

At common law, an illegitimate child could not inherit. Our…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Bowers v. Van WinkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Trimble v. TrimbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Fleming v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Sullivan v. McGowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lankford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Stewart v. WellsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Ford v. ClevelandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API