Legal Opinion

Haas v. Missionary Society of the Most Holy Redeemer

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 15, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action by Margaret Haas against the Missionary Society of the Most Holy Redeemer. Plaintiff moves to open a default taken at trial term.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

The facts presented, I think, abundantly excuse the absence of the plaintiff’s attorney when this case was called, and I would have no hesitation in opening it upon reasonable terms, were it not for the very grave question presented upon the motion as to the right of the plaintiff to recover, in any event. It is admitted by the pleadings that the “defendant is a religious corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the state of New York,” and the question is whether, under the laws of this state, the plaintiff can maintain an action to recover damages for injuries received by reason of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Maxmilian v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Fire Insurance Patrol v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  5. Perry ex rel. Perry v. House of RefugeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Powers v. Massachusetts Homœopathic HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
  2. Bruce v. Central Methodist Episcopal ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Kellogg v. Church Charity FoundationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Brown v. La Société Française De Bienfaisance MutuelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API