Legal Opinion
Coney v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 6, 2006No. 3D06-705PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
937 So.2d 255 (2006)
Antonio CONEY, Petitioner,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 3D06-705.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
September 6, 2006.
Antonio Coney, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Thomas C. Mielke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before WELLS, CORTIÑAS, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
ROTHENBERG, Judge.
The petitioner, Antonio Coney ("Coney"), seeks a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to Rule 9.141(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. As we conclude that Coney's claim is without…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rutherford v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Valle v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Brantley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gregory v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Russ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Valencia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007