Legal Opinion

Kennemer v. McFann

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 15, 1985No. 83-82PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This co-employee suit, pursuant to Code 1975, § 25-5-11, presents three issues on appeal: Whether the trial court erred 1) in its oral instructions to the jury with respect to the duties owed to Plaintiffs by Defendants; 2) in its denial of Defendants' motions for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict; and 3) in instructing the jury on certain rules of the road.

Plaintiffs Paul J. McFann and Curtis Broughton1 suffered on-the-job injuries while passengers in a truck owned by their employer, Wright and Lopez, Inc., and operated by their immediate supervisor, Michael (Mike)…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Welch v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Treadway v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Davenport v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Stovall v. Universal Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Noble v. McManusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Clark v. FloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Fowler v. Jenkins (In Re Jenkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API