Legal Opinion

Pacific Car & Foundry Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 2, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 6823Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LINDBERG, Chief Judge.

This is an action» for the recovery of excise taxes paid by K-W Dart Truck Co. on the sale of certain vehicle parts. The parts in question were purchased by K-W Dart Truck Co. from the original manufacturers and resold by K-W Dart for eventual use as replacement parts on off-highway vehicles manufactured by K-W Dart. At least 95% of these parts were actually used as replacement parts on K-W Dart off-highway vehicles.

Section 4061(b) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 imposes a tax on the sale by the manufacturer of parts or accessories for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. McCaughn v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
  5. American-La France Fire Engine Co. v. RiordanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API