Legal Opinion

Holland America Line Inc v. Wärtsilä North America, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 2007No. 05-35572PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

485 F.3d 450

HOLLAND AMERICA LINE INC; and Windstar Sail Cruises Ltd, on behalf of themselves as former agents, owners and operators of the former vessel M/S/Y Wind Song, and together on behalf of their subrogated insurers, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

WÄRTSILÄ NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant, and

Wärtsilä Finland Oy; Wärtsilä Corporation; Bureau Veritas S.A.; Bureau Veritas (Canada) Inc.; Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-35572.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted December 7, 2006.

Filed May 7, 2007.

Frank Brucculeri and Bradley M. Rose,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pandaw America, Inc. v. Pandaw Cruises India Pvt. Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
  2. Fraserside IP L.L.C. v. LetyaginDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012
  3. Fraserside IP L.L.C. v. Netvertising Ltd.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012
  4. Amazon.com, Inc. v. Robojap Technologies LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  5. Caballeros, Inc. v. Centruro, S.A.P.I. DE C.V.District Court, C.D. California · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API