Legal Opinion
Dion Anderson v. Edmund Brown, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 5, 2016No. 15-16408UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
California state prisoner Dion Anderson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Anderson’s action because Anderson failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plau sible claim for relief.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aguilar v. Safeway Stores IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Burnham v. DeMouraDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- Smith v. Sheriff's BarnstableDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020