Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Crooks

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error fo Kalamazoo.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

This was an action of ejectment brought to recover possession of a certain strip of land. Both parties claimed title from the same common grantor.

The deed offered in evidence by defendants should not have been received, unless the agreement to Par-meter referred to therein was also introduced. The conveyance was made subject “to all the conditions, and all the legal and equitable liabilities and conveyances” that might arise under the contract previously executed by the grantors to Parmeter, “and against said instrument in writing or the legal (or) equitable effect of which no covenant in…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. King v. . RhewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Bunce v. BidwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Chicago Lumbering Co. v. PowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Pugh v. SchindlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Parsons v. BillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API