Theo. Weiss & Co. v. Stuart, Keith & Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a Patent- Office decision in a trade-mark interference proceeding in which priority and the right of registration were awarded the junior party, appellee here.
The appellee, in its verified petition for registration, alleged that it had continuously used the mark for which it sought registration since September 7, 1910, and that' it had applied the mark “directly to the goods by printing or stamping the same thereon,” and also had applied or affixed it to the good’s, by placing thereon, or on the package containing them, printed labels on which the¡ mark was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of PatentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ostermoor & Co. v. Rose Spring & Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925