Legal Opinion

Hueter v. Kruse

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided October 20, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00226Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII STEVEN JAY PINCUS HUETER, AKA CIV. NO. 21-00226 JMS-KJM TAO, ET AL., ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER Plaintiffs, SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING vs. LEALAIALOA FRITZ MICHAEL KRUSE, ET AL., Defendants. ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND In this case, pro se Plaintiffs Steven Jay Pincus Hueter, Faamuli Pete Faamuli, and Michael “Candyman” Kirk (“Plaintiffs”) bring—among other claims—a 42 U.S.C § 1983 cause of action alleging that Lealaialoa Fritz Michael Kruse, the Chief Justice of the High Court of American…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Downes v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API