Legal Opinion

Lee v. Exchange National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 10, 1923No. 14755PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Where the maker of a promissory note asserts, in defense to an action thereon, that he entrusted it to a third person to be delivered to the payee or plaintiff only upon the happening of a certain event, such defense is not sustained unless the defendant shows, among other things, that the event did not happen before the delivery of the *471note. He should, show not merely that the condition existed, but that it was violated. Automobile Battery Co. v. Geraghty, 30 Ga. App. 446 (7) (118 S. E. 412).

Decided December 10, 1923.

2. The defense that the note sued on was a nude pact was in violation of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carter v. HaralsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Automobile Battery Co. v. Geraghty & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Potts v. LevinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Clarke v. FanningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Hance Hardware Co. v. HowardSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
  4. Potts v. LevinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API