Legal Opinion

Coffer v. Paris

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1977No. KCD 27989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, a passenger in an automobile which was struck from the rear by an auto mobile operated by defendant, filed suit to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff’s case was submitted to a jury under the “rear-end doctrine”. The jury found in plaintiff’s favor and awarded her damages in the sum and amount of $15,-000.00. Defendant filed a motion for new trial, alleging twenty-four instances of error, which was sustained by the trial court on the sole ground that plaintiff’s verdict directing instruction deviated from the applicable instruction prescribed by MAI. Plaintiff appeals…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Murphy Ex Rel. Murphy v. LandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Jones v. Central States Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. Strohm v. . the N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Lorch v. EglinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Hughes v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McDowell v. SchuetteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Owen v. OwenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Damon Pursell Construction Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Andersen v. OsmonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Jenkins v. JordanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API