Frazier v. State

Appellant challenges his convictions for attempted first degree murder, attempted second degree murder, and armed burglary with a firearm. His main argument on appeal is that the court erred in denying his motion for discharge based upon a speedy trial violation. We conclude that a continuance was granted, and no speedy trial violation occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence.

This is the second appearance of this case in our court. In 1995 we reversed appellant’s first conviction and sentence and remanded for a new trial. See Frazier v. State, 664 So.2d 985 (Fla.…