State v. Woodland

GRIMM, Presiding Judge.

In this jury tried case, defendant appeals his convictions of sodomy and kidnapping) *618in violation of §§ 566.060 and 565.110, RSMo 1986. We affirm.

Defendant alleges two errors. First, the trial court erred “in excluding testimony of [a court reporter] as to the prior inconsistent statements made by [the victim] in that this was a proper method of introducing these statements which were admissible as substantive evidence.” Defendant’s point is not preserved. Further, defendant’s offer of proof at trial was for a purpose different than the one now asserted on appeal.…