Legal Opinion
Twin City Fire Insurance v. CNA Insurance
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided November 9, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
STAGG, Chief Judge.
Twin City Fire Insurance Company (hereinafter, “Twin City”), has the excess insurance carrier for Arnold Pipe and Supply Company, Ltd. (hereinafter, “Arnold Pipe”), has filed this “bad faith action” against Arnold Pipe’s primary carrier, CNA Insurance Company (hereinafter, “CNA”), seeking moneys paid together with legal interest, penalties and attorney’s fees. The money sought to be recovered was paid as the result of a judgment entered against Arnold Pipe on November 13, 1985 which triggered the excess insurance coverage. Twin City predicates this action…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Geoffrey Raymond Peter Norman Valentine v. Aetna Insurance Company, Geoffrey Raymond Peter Norman Valentine v. Continental Casualty Company, Geoffrey Raymond Peter Norman Valentine v. Royal Globe Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Laper v. Board of Com'rsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. United General InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1987
- Perry Seeney, Et Ux., and Calvin Demeritt, Et Ux. v. Citgo Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Great Southwest Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. CompaniesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Twin City Fire Ins. v. Cna InsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990